A man who is called a judge has declared that law on unnatural sexual intercourse in India is unconstitutional. The reports in media as they say term it to be a historical Judgment.
Question arises as to what are the criteria of the term historical. The acts of unnatural activities in sex acts are not prohibited unless and until the other partner denies to co operate. Who will be third person to complain against the act done with consent? It would have been better to keep mum on the topic instead of pronouncing such vulgar validity. Introductory part in Indian Penal Code where general exception are written, it is clearly mentioned that any act done with the consent of other shall not be an offence.
The un necessary and undue propaganda for the subject by the media shows the inclination towards perversions by the new generation. I think all cases under section 377 of Indian Penal Code are unnatural sexual activity without consent of passive part.
Therefore subject should not be highlighted in such a way. The section 377 is a good rule in accordance with the nature and our culture.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
